N.M. Politics

Senator to deliver first Senate floor speech

June 12th, 2013 at 3:24 pm by under N.M. Politics

Sen. Martin Heinrich will tout New Mexico’s role in meeting past and future energy challenges in his first Senate floor speech on Thursday.

A statement from the senators office says the speech will be delivered at about 8:15 a.m. New Mexico time and will air on CSPAN-2, which also will stream it online.

“In his speech, Senator Heinrich will discuss the important role that New Mexico has played and will continue to play in shaping the nation’s energy future, and that our capacity to deal with many of our 21st century challenges rests heavily on our ability to make policy that is driven by facts, by data, and by science,” the statement said.

Heinrich, a Democrat and former congressman, was elected to the Senate last year succeeding Sen. Jeff Bingman, who retired.


Councilors to vote on police oversight, gun buyback

April 15th, 2013 at 12:38 pm by under N.M. Politics, News

Albuquerque city councilors are gearing up for a busy meeting Monday night.

They are scheduled to vote on changing the police oversight commission, the group that’s said to be policing the police department.

Four councilors have two different sets of plans to give the commission more oversight.

Plus, councilors are expected to vote on whether to set money aside to join Bernalillo County’s gun buyback program.

The meeting starts at 5 p.m.


From the Roundhouse: No-Win Situation

March 13th, 2013 at 8:06 am by under N.M. Politics

Who wins when everybody loses?

It’s the question many may be asking when this session wraps up because when all is said and done, you may find neither side got much of anything they wanted this year.

Why the doom and gloom after a session that seemed to start with one compromise after the other (gun control, spaceport being the two that come to mind immediately)?

It comes from taking an honest look at where proposals for both Democrats and Republicans sit.

Let’s look at the Republican side first, specifically from Governor Martinez’s perspective.

The State of the State address that opened up this session had a main theme of competitiveness. Highlighted proposals included a corporate tax rate cut from 7.6 percent to 4.9 percent and allowing businesses to base their corporate taxes on a single sales factor.

That paired with several key education proposals including merit pay for teachers and mandatory retention for third graders who can’t read among others.

Add to all of that the annual push to repeal the law that allows illegal immigrants to get driver’s licenses.

From the Democratic side, there’s plenty they were looking to get done as well.

Pay raises for state workers and teachers was a priority. So was increasing the minimum wage and expanding the film tax credits the state currently issues. On the education side, reforming the A-F grading system used to evaluate schools was one of the proposals pitched.

So what’s happened on all of these issues?

Driver’s licenses appears to be going nowhere fast and would seem an incredible long shot to get done this session after stalling in a House committee. The third grade reading retention proposal never got even that far.

Merit pay was originally in the House version of the budget but was pulled out by the Senate. Even though that budget passed the Senate unanimously, House Republicans say they’ll fight the House agreeing with those amendments Wednesday.

On the Senate side, the Governor’s tax reforms were bundled together with a Democratic proposal she vetoed last year dealing with cutting exemptions for out-of-state companies. In addition, the corporate tax cut proposed would drop the state rate down to 6.4 percent, well below what the Governor wants. The Governor’s office has said they won’t support that bill either and called it “gimmicky”.

All of that has led to the threat from the Governor to veto the budget in its current form, which would kill teacher pay raises in the process.

It’s also led to a Dem-backed film tax credit bill (the Breaking Bad bill) that had bipartisan support in passing both chambers being left in limbo on the Governor’s desk with a veto not out of the question.

That adds to expected vetoes on minimum wage and any attempt to alter the A-F system PED implemented.

Add it all up and unless there’s some significant compromise in the last four days of the session (don’t hold your breath), we could be in for a special session after a 60-day session.

Of course, this could all be just one big game of chicken and a deal could be cut.

The answer is only four long days away.

Bill of the Day

HB 325

Rep. Georgene Louis’, D-Albuquerque, bill would give employers an alternative to layoffs by allowing them to cut hours of a group of employees instead.

You can find out more about the proposal here.

HB 325 squeaked by the House and is heading for the Senate.


From the Roundhouse: Two Deadlines

March 12th, 2013 at 9:03 am by under N.M. Politics

Monday we saw the pace pick up in Santa Fe as bills both large and small (mostly small) made their way to the fourth floor to face the wrath of the Governor’s veto pen or into the next chamber.

That included the “Breaking Bad” film tax credits bill, a statewide health insurance exchange, a bill cutting penalties pot possession and the long-awaited spaceport liability bill.

The quick pace should be get a little quicker on some issues because of the two deadlines in effect at the Roundhouse.

One is the obvious one…. Saturday at noon. That’s when the session is over. If your bill isn’t up to the Governor by then, you’re out of luck plain and simple.

But the other one is one Democrats especially have their eye on.

According to the New Mexico Constitution, the Governor’s time to render a veto has everything to do with when that bill is passed.

During the first 57 days of the session (or 27 days during even years), any proposal that makes it past the legislature must be acted on within three days or it becomes law.

A veto then and a two-thirds vote of each chamber overrides the Governor.

But in the last three days, the power shifts to the fourth floor. The Governor gets 20 days to look at bills and any veto is final.

That means any proposal that has the support of the legislature but leaves doubt as to whether the Governor is totally on board is best passed before the last three days.

There’s no perfect example for what that kind of bill would be.

Minimum wage certainly appears to be unpopular with Governor Martinez, but there would likely be problems scraping together the two-thirds vote needed.

The “Breaking Bad” bill is expected to be signed, but some Democrats tell me it makes sense to get it on her desk before the three-day deadline “just in case”. This hesitancy could have to do with the cap Governor Martinez helped put on film tax credits in the first place.

Perhaps the best example might be the budget. The Senate hasn’t monkeyed around too much with the House version, except for taking out a key provision for teacher merit pay the administration wanted.

There’s some thought that the 1 percent raise for all state workers could be axed by a line item veto as retribution. Getting the budget upstairs sooner rather than later would give the legislature time to override. They may have the votes based on the support the House gave the bill.

Bill of the Day

HB 223

Rep. Larry Larranaga’s, R-Albuquerque, bill to push economic development stirred some debate on the House floor before passing 51-14.

HB 223 provides a GRT deduction for companies working with the Department of Defense on directed energy and satellite projects.

You can learn more about the bill in my story»

HB 223 has one committee to clear in the Senate but it faces a tall task.

It’s been assigned to Senate Finance, where chair John Arthur Smith, D-Deming, (aka Dr. No) presides. In past interviews I’ve done with him he hasn’t looked at tax breaks and loopholes too fondly and the potential $33.6 million revenue loss from the bill in the first four years isn’t likely to make him smile.


From the Roundhouse: Conflict and Resolution

March 8th, 2013 at 7:47 pm by under N.M. Politics

With time running short in the session, the timeline to get things done shortens. That applies to House-Senate feuds as much as bills.

The set-up for Thursday’s blowup may have come from a few sources.

During a debate on pension reform, Senate Majority Leader Michael Sanchez, D-Belen, wanted an amendment on a bill to overhaul the Public Employees Retirement Association.

Before the session, it appeared there was an agreement on the plan to solve PERA’s woes (an unfunded liability of $6.2 billion). As part of that plan, the employee contribution would go up 1.5 percent as would the state’s contribution.

But several Republicans and the governor’s office balked at the state increase, pointing out that New Mexico is among the most generous of states in paying into its public employee’s pension plans.

So the bill was amended in committee to cut the rate increase for the state to just 0.4 percent.

Sanchez backed an amendment to take that change back. After a long floor debate though, he lost 24-18. That vote meant seven fellow Democrats bailed on him.

Sanchez was one of just four votes who opposed the bill’s final passage out of the Senate.

Meanwhile over in the House, representatives struck down a bill that was popular with senators, for a good reason.

Senate Bill 336, a bill effectively allowing senators and other elected officials serving four-year terms to double the contribution limits they can receive from individual donors, passed the Senate 40-0. But the House representatives, who are elected to two-year terms and wouldn’t be affected, voted down the bill 34-32, killing the legislation.

Meanwhile the House appears at least somewhat upset that the only bill of theirs passed out was the very bill needed to fund the Legislature.

All of that happened before sparks flew in Santa Fe. You can read my story for what exactly happened or watch the full uncut video of the confrontation here

But even as early as Thursday night, the rift seemed to be mending. And Friday, it seemed like nothing ever happened. Senate Education moved on several House bills in the morning, and the House never seemed to stop hearing Senate bills.

All in all, it seems like nothing more than a small bump in the road practically. Part of that is because there’s little time left in the session. Bickering is one thing, but getting nothing done is a far bigger problem for state lawmakers.

Even hurt feelings don’t change that political reality.

But Thursday’s battle and votes on the Senate floor further indicate a point I’ve talked about a lot on this blog. On many issues (except for minimum wage), conservative Democrats and Republicans appear to have the votes, not majority leadership. That one theme could set the stage for more tough battles as both parties try to get their priority bills through.

Bill of the Day: Senate Bill 306

Sen. Steven Neville, R-Aztec, wants school districts to have the opportunity to set up their own school district police departments.

SB 306 would give school district police authority to enforce laws within the districts and on school grounds. In the fiscal impact report, APS notes that setting up independent police forces could allow districts to reap federal grant funding.

Neville’s bill was scheduled for its second committee, Senate Judiciary on Friday.